<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WinBreak.com &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://winbreak.com/tag/hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://winbreak.com</link>
	<description>Video game fanblogging...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EETimes reporter guesses at the RRoD&#8230; wrongly.</title>
		<link>http://winbreak.com/2008/06/10/eetimes-reporter-guesses-at-the-rrod-wrongly/</link>
		<comments>http://winbreak.com/2008/06/10/eetimes-reporter-guesses-at-the-rrod-wrongly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NuAngel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRoD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox 360]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://winbreak.com/2008/06/10/eetimes-reporter-guesses-at-the-rrod-wrongly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Junko Yoshida, writer for EETimes.com, put together an article entitled The truth about last year&#8217;s Xbox 360 recall. The article is wrong from the title on down. Microsoft never once issued a true &#8220;recall.&#8221; They offered extended coverage for a single well-known and wide-spread issue. Yoshida continues his inaccuracies when he says that Microsoft developed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://winbreak.com/newspix/RedA-button.png"><br />
Junko Yoshida, writer for EETimes.com, put together an article entitled <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208403010">The truth about last year&#8217;s Xbox 360 recall</a>.  The article is wrong from the title on down.  Microsoft never once issued a true &#8220;recall.&#8221;  They offered extended coverage for a single well-known and wide-spread issue.<P><br />
Yoshida continues his inaccuracies when he says that Microsoft developed their own graphics processor, and that&#8217;s where the problems came from.  He says that only after the &#8220;recall&#8221; did they call up a &#8220;United States&#8221; based company, which he assumes was the former ATi.  First: ATi is/was Canadian based.  Now part of AMD, the graphics chip division still resides mostly in Canada.  Second: the Xbox 360 has used the ATi R500 &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenos">Xenos</a>&#8221; chip since it has launched.<P><br />
Microsoft has admitted there is a problem, isn&#8217;t that good enough?  Let&#8217;s not beat this dead horse anymore, people.  Especially not with hit-grabbing tactics filled with inaccurate reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://winbreak.com/2008/06/10/eetimes-reporter-guesses-at-the-rrod-wrongly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

